标签: AI Models

  • Can Physical Filtration Principles Improve Attention Head Design in AI?

    Can Physical Filtration Principles Improve Attention Head Design in AI?

    I recently stumbled upon an interesting idea after a long coding session. What if physical filtration principles could inform the design of attention heads in AI models? This concept might seem unusual, but bear with me as we explore it.

    In physical filtration, materials are layered by particle size to filter out specific elements. For example, in water filtration, you might use fine sand, coarse sand, gravel, and crushed stone, with each layer handling a specific size of particles. This process is subtractive, meaning each layer removes certain elements, allowing only the desired particles to pass through.

    Now, let’s consider attention heads in transformers. These models learn to focus on specific parts of the input data, but this process is often emergent and not explicitly constrained. What if we were to explicitly constrain attention heads to specific receptive field sizes, similar to physical filter substrates?

    For instance, we could have:

    * Heads 1-4: only attend within 16 tokens (fine)
    * Heads 5-8: attend within 64 tokens (medium)
    * Heads 9-12: global attention (coarse)

    This approach might not be entirely new, as some models like Longformer and BigBird already use binary local/global splits. Additionally, WaveNet uses dilated convolutions with exponential receptive fields. However, the idea of explicitly constraining attention heads to specific sizes could potentially reduce compute requirements and add interpretability to the model.

    But, there are also potential drawbacks to this approach. The flexibility of unconstrained heads might be a key aspect of their effectiveness, and explicitly constraining them could limit their ability to learn complex patterns. Furthermore, this idea might have already been tried and proven not to work.

    Another interesting aspect to consider is the concept of subtractive attention, where fine-grained heads ‘handle’ local patterns and remove them from the residual stream, allowing coarse heads to focus on more ambiguous patterns. While this idea is still highly speculative, it could potentially lead to more efficient and effective attention mechanisms.

    So, is this idea worth exploring further? Should we be looking into physical filtration principles as a way to improve attention head design in AI models? I’d love to hear your thoughts on this topic.

  • Is GPT 5.1 a Step Backwards?

    Is GPT 5.1 a Step Backwards?

    I recently came across a post claiming that GPT 5.1 is dumber than its predecessor, GPT 4. The author couldn’t find a single thing that the new version does better. This got me thinking – what’s going on with the latest AI models? Are they really improving, or are we just getting caught up in the hype?

    It’s no secret that AI technology is advancing rapidly. New models are being released all the time, each promising to be more powerful and efficient than the last. But is this always the case? It’s possible that in the rush to innovate, some models might actually be taking a step backwards.

    So, what could be causing this? Maybe it’s a case of over-complication. As AI models get more complex, they can sometimes lose sight of what made their predecessors great in the first place. It’s like trying to add too many features to a product – eventually, it can become bloated and difficult to use.

    On the other hand, it’s also possible that the author of the post just hadn’t found the right use case for GPT 5.1 yet. Maybe there are certain tasks that the new model excels at, but they haven’t been discovered yet.

    Either way, it’s an interesting discussion to have. Are AI models always getting better, or are there times when they take a step backwards? What do you think?

  • Running ONNX AI Models with Clojure: A New Era for Machine Learning

    Running ONNX AI Models with Clojure: A New Era for Machine Learning

    Hey, have you heard about the latest development in the Clojure world? It’s now possible to run ONNX AI models directly in Clojure. This is a big deal for machine learning enthusiasts and developers who work with Clojure.

    For those who might not know, ONNX (Open Neural Network Exchange) is an open format used to represent trained machine learning models. It allows models to be transferred between different frameworks and platforms, making it a crucial tool for deploying AI models in various environments.

    The ability to run ONNX models in Clojure means that developers can now leverage the power of machine learning in their Clojure applications. This could lead to some exciting innovations, from natural language processing to image recognition and more.

    But what does this mean for you? If you’re a Clojure developer, you can now integrate machine learning into your projects without having to leave the comfort of your favorite programming language. And if you’re an AI enthusiast, you can explore the possibilities of ONNX models in a new and powerful ecosystem.

    To learn more about this development and how to get started with running ONNX models in Clojure, you can check out the article by Dragan Djordjevic, which provides a detailed overview of the process and its implications.

  • The Art of Video Generation: Exploring Text-to-Image-to-Video Techniques

    The Art of Video Generation: Exploring Text-to-Image-to-Video Techniques

    Hey, have you ever wondered how videos can be generated from text prompts? I recently stumbled upon an interesting technique that involves a two-step process: text-to-image followed by image-to-video. This method has shown promising results in creating highly realistic videos.

    The process starts with prompting a text-to-image model to generate an image based on a given text description. For example, you could ask the model to create an image of Marilyn Monroe dancing in a different outfit. Once the image is generated, it can be used as a prompt for an image-to-video model to create a video.

    I found an example of this technique in action on TikTok, where a user generated a video of Marilyn Monroe dancing in a unique outfit. The video was created by first modifying an image of Marilyn Monroe using a text-to-image model, and then using the resulting image as a prompt for a video generation model.

    This technique has the potential to revolutionize the way we create videos. By leveraging the power of text-to-image and image-to-video models, we can generate highly realistic videos with minimal effort. The possibilities are endless, from creating personalized music videos to generating educational content.

    If you’re interested in exploring this technique further, I recommend checking out the TikTok video and experimenting with different text prompts and image-to-video models. Who knows what kind of amazing videos you’ll create?

    So, what do you think about this technique? Have you tried generating videos using text-to-image-to-video methods? Share your experiences and thoughts in the comments below.

  • How Signal Processing is Revolutionizing AI: A New Perspective on LLMs and ANN Search

    How Signal Processing is Revolutionizing AI: A New Perspective on LLMs and ANN Search

    I recently came across an interesting concept that combines signal processing principles with AI models to make them more efficient and accurate. This idea is being explored in collaboration with Prof. Gunnar Carlsson, a pioneer in topological data analysis. The goal is to apply signal processing techniques, traditionally used in communication systems, to AI models and embedding spaces.

    One of the first applications of this concept is in ANN search, where it has achieved 10x faster vector search than current solutions. This is a significant breakthrough, especially for those interested in vector databases. You can find more information on this topic in a technical note and video titled ‘Traversal is Killing Vector Search — How Signal Processing is the Future’.

    The potential of signal processing in AI is vast, and it’s exciting to think about how it could shape the next wave of AI systems. If you’re in the Bay Area, there’s an upcoming event where you can discuss this topic with experts and like-minded individuals. Additionally, the team will be attending TechCrunch Disrupt 2025, providing another opportunity to meet and brainstorm.

    So, what does this mean for the future of AI? It’s clear that signal processing has the potential to complement modern AI architectures, making them more efficient and accurate. As this technology continues to evolve, it will be interesting to see how it’s applied in various fields and the impact it has on the development of AI systems.