So, you’ve got an unpublished manuscript from your undergrad days, and you’re wondering if it’s okay to add it to your PhD application CV. I’ve been in similar shoes, and it’s a valid question. The short answer is, it depends on how you present it.
First, let’s talk about what an unpublished manuscript is. It’s essentially a research paper that hasn’t been published in a journal or conference proceedings. In your case, you submitted it to a conference, but it got rejected, and you never resubmitted or posted it on arXiv.
Now, when it comes to including it in your CV, you can definitely mention it, but be honest about its status. You could add it to your publications section, but make sure to label it as an ‘Unpublished Manuscript’ and provide a link to the manuscript if possible. This way, you’re being transparent about its status, and the reviewer can still access your work.
Here are a few things to keep in mind:
* Be clear about the manuscript’s status: Make it obvious that it’s unpublished, so you don’t mislead the reviewer.
* Provide context: Give a brief explanation of why the manuscript is unpublished, e.g., it was rejected from a conference.
* Focus on the quality of your work: Even if the manuscript isn’t published, the quality of your research and writing is what matters most.
Including an unpublished manuscript in your PhD application CV can be a good idea if you present it correctly. It shows that you’re proactive, and you’ve been working on research projects, even if they didn’t get published. Just remember to be honest and transparent about its status, and you’ll be fine.
If you’re still unsure, you could always reach out to your academic advisor or someone in your department for guidance. They’ve likely seen many PhD applications and can give you more specific advice.