I’ve been thinking a lot about the idea that AI and robots will replace all human jobs, leaving us to live off government survival-level paychecks. But I’m not convinced. My main argument against this is simple: humans want things, and we’re willing to work to get them. Whether it’s a personal yacht, a dream house, or a fancy car, our desires drive us to earn more and achieve more. In a world where AI has taken over all jobs, it’s unlikely that everyone would be content with just the basics. We’d still find ways to work and earn money to get the things we want. For example, if I want a yacht, I’m not going to just sit at home and wait for the government to provide it for me. I’ll find a way to earn the money to buy it, whether that’s by starting my own business, investing in stocks, or taking on a side hustle. And I’m not alone – there are plenty of people out there who are driven by their passions and desires, and who will stop at nothing to achieve their goals. So, while AI may certainly change the job market and automate certain tasks, I don’t think it will replace human jobs completely. We’ll always find ways to work and earn money to get the things we want, and that’s what makes us human. Some of the key points to consider include:
* Humans have a natural desire for more, which drives us to work and earn money
* AI may automate certain tasks, but it won’t replace human creativity, passion, and drive
* There will always be opportunities for people to work and earn money, even in an AI-driven economy
* The idea of a universal basic income may seem appealing, but it’s unlikely to be enough to satisfy our desires and ambitions
发表回复