博客

Unlocking Smarter Workflows: Introducing Plano 0.4.3

Hey, have you heard about the latest update to Plano? It’s version 0.4.3, and it’s bringing some exciting changes to the table. As someone who’s interested in making workflows more efficient, I think you’ll find this pretty interesting.

So, what’s new in Plano 0.4.3? Two main things: Filter Chains and OpenRouter Integration. Let’s break them down.

Filter Chains are a way to capture reusable workflow steps in the data plane. Think of it like a series of mutations that a request flows through before reaching its final destination. Each filter is a network-addressable service that can inspect, mutate, or enrich the request. It’s like having a lightweight programming model over HTTP for building reusable steps in your agent architectures.

Here are some key things that Filter Chains can do:

* Inspect the incoming prompt, metadata, and conversation state
* Mutate or enrich the request (like rewriting queries or building context)
* Short-circuit the flow and return a response early (like blocking a request on a compliance failure)
* Emit structured logs and traces for debugging and improvement

The other major update is the introduction of Passthrough Client Bearer Auth. This allows Plano to forward the client’s original Authorization header to the upstream service, instead of using a static access key. It’s useful for deploying Plano in front of LLM proxy services that manage their own API key validation.

Some potential use cases for this include:

* OpenRouter: Forward requests to OpenRouter with per-user API keys
* Multi-tenant Deployments: Allow different clients to use their own credentials via Plano

Overall, these updates seem like a step in the right direction for making Plano more powerful and flexible. If you’re working with agent architectures or LLM proxy services, it’s definitely worth checking out.

2026年1月23日
Can Physical Filtration Principles Improve Attention Head Design in AI?

I recently stumbled upon an interesting idea after a long coding session. What if physical filtration principles could inform the design of attention heads in AI models? This concept might seem unusual, but bear with me as we explore it.

In physical filtration, materials are layered by particle size to filter out specific elements. For example, in water filtration, you might use fine sand, coarse sand, gravel, and crushed stone, with each layer handling a specific size of particles. This process is subtractive, meaning each layer removes certain elements, allowing only the desired particles to pass through.

Now, let’s consider attention heads in transformers. These models learn to focus on specific parts of the input data, but this process is often emergent and not explicitly constrained. What if we were to explicitly constrain attention heads to specific receptive field sizes, similar to physical filter substrates?

For instance, we could have:

* Heads 1-4: only attend within 16 tokens (fine)
* Heads 5-8: attend within 64 tokens (medium)
* Heads 9-12: global attention (coarse)

This approach might not be entirely new, as some models like Longformer and BigBird already use binary local/global splits. Additionally, WaveNet uses dilated convolutions with exponential receptive fields. However, the idea of explicitly constraining attention heads to specific sizes could potentially reduce compute requirements and add interpretability to the model.

But, there are also potential drawbacks to this approach. The flexibility of unconstrained heads might be a key aspect of their effectiveness, and explicitly constraining them could limit their ability to learn complex patterns. Furthermore, this idea might have already been tried and proven not to work.

Another interesting aspect to consider is the concept of subtractive attention, where fine-grained heads ‘handle’ local patterns and remove them from the residual stream, allowing coarse heads to focus on more ambiguous patterns. While this idea is still highly speculative, it could potentially lead to more efficient and effective attention mechanisms.

So, is this idea worth exploring further? Should we be looking into physical filtration principles as a way to improve attention head design in AI models? I’d love to hear your thoughts on this topic.

2026年1月18日
Detecting Surface Cracks on Concrete Structures with Machine Learning

I’ve been fascinated by the potential of machine learning to improve infrastructure inspection. Recently, I came across a project that aims to detect surface cracks on concrete structures using ML algorithms. The idea is to train a model on images of cracked concrete surfaces, so it can learn to identify similar patterns in new images.

But why is this important? Well, inspecting concrete structures for cracks is a crucial task, especially in construction and maintenance. Cracks can indicate structural weaknesses, which can lead to safety issues and costly repairs if left unchecked. By using ML to detect cracks, we can potentially automate this process, making it faster and more efficient.

So, how does it work? The process typically involves collecting a dataset of images of concrete surfaces with cracks, annotating the images to highlight the cracks, and then training an ML model on this data. The model can then be used to predict the presence of cracks in new images.

I think this is a great example of how ML can be applied to real-world problems. It’s not just about detecting cracks; it’s about improving safety and reducing maintenance costs. If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, I’d recommend checking out some research papers on ML-based crack detection or exploring online resources like GitHub repositories and blogs.

Some potential applications of this technology include:

* Inspecting bridges and buildings for structural damage
* Monitoring concrete structures in harsh environments, like coastal areas
* Automating quality control in construction projects

It’s exciting to think about the possibilities of ML in this field. As the technology continues to evolve, we can expect to see more accurate and efficient crack detection systems.

What do you think about the potential of ML in infrastructure inspection? Have you come across any interesting projects or applications in this area?

2026年1月18日
The Frustrating Reality of Irreproducible Research Papers

I recently came across a research paper from 2025 that caught my attention. The idea behind it wasn’t particularly new or groundbreaking, but I was interested in exploring it further. However, when I tried to access the code linked in the paper, I found that it was broken.

After some digging, I discovered that the same paper had been rejected from another conference, but the authors had shared their code there. I decided to reach out to the corresponding author to ask about the experimental procedure, hoping to learn from their work and even build upon it.

What followed was a series of frustrating interactions. The first author shared a GitHub repository that had been created just three weeks prior, but the experimental setup was still very vague. When I asked for clarification, the author became unresponsive.

As someone who has worked in this field for a while, I know that sharing code is not only possible but also essential for advancing research. It’s disappointing to see authors being secretive about their methods, especially when they’ve already shared their work publicly.

I’m not looking to call out the authors or the paper specifically, but I do want to highlight the importance of reproducibility in research. If we can’t replicate the results of a study, how can we trust its findings? And if authors are unwilling to share their methods, what does that say about the validity of their work?

I’d love to hear from others who have experienced similar frustrations. Have you ever tried to reproduce a study, only to find that the authors were uncooperative or unclear about their methods? How did you handle the situation?

Let’s work together to promote transparency and reproducibility in research. By sharing our methods and data, we can build upon each other’s work and make real progress in our fields.

2026年1月17日
Daily AI Updates: What You Need to Know

Hey, let’s talk about the latest AI news. There are some pretty interesting developments happening right now. For instance, OpenAI just signed a $10 billion deal with Cerebras for AI computing. This is huge because it shows how much investment is going into making AI more powerful and accessible.

But that’s not all. There’s a new generative AI tool called MechStyle that’s helping people 3D print personal items that can withstand daily use. Imagine being able to create custom items that fit your needs perfectly, just by using AI. It’s pretty cool.

AI is also making progress in solving high-level math problems. This could lead to breakthroughs in all sorts of fields, from science to finance. And while it’s exciting, it’s also important to consider the potential risks and challenges that come with advanced AI capabilities.

On a more serious note, California is investigating xAI and Grok over sexualized AI images. This is a reminder that as AI becomes more integrated into our lives, we need to make sure it’s being used responsibly and ethically.

These are just a few examples of what’s happening in the world of AI right now. It’s an exciting time, but it’s also important to stay informed and think critically about how AI is shaping our world.

2026年1月15日
Why Causality Matters in Machine Learning: Moving Beyond Correlation

I’ve been working with machine learning systems for a while now, and I’ve noticed a common problem. Models that look great on paper often fail in real-world production because they focus on correlations rather than causal mechanisms. This is a big deal, because if your model is just finding patterns in the data, it might not actually be able to predict what will happen in the future or make good decisions.

Let me give you an example. Imagine you’re building a model to diagnose plant diseases. Your model can predict the disease with 90% accuracy, but if it’s just looking at correlations, it might give you recommendations that actually make things worse. That’s because prediction isn’t the same as intervention. Just because your model can predict what’s happening doesn’t mean it knows how to fix it.

So, what’s the solution? It’s to build models that understand causality. This means looking at the underlying mechanisms that drive the data, rather than just the patterns in the data itself. It’s a harder problem, but it’s also a more important one.

I’ve been exploring this topic in a series of blog posts, where I dive into the details of building causal machine learning systems. I cover topics like Pearl’s Ladder of Causation, which is a framework for understanding the different levels of causality. I also look at practical implications, like when you need to use causal models and when correlation is enough.

One of the key insights from this work is that your model can be really good at predicting something, but still give you bad advice. That’s because prediction and intervention are different things. To build models that can actually make good decisions, you need to focus on causality.

If you’re interested in learning more, I’d recommend checking out my blog series. It’s a deep dive into the world of causal machine learning, but it’s also accessible to anyone who’s interested in the topic. And if you have any thoughts or questions, I’d love to hear them.

2026年1月13日
Breaking Down Barriers in AI: Extending Context with DroPE

I just learned about a fascinating new method called DroPE, which allows us to extend the context length of pretrained Large Language Models (LLMs) without the usual hefty compute costs. This innovation, introduced by Sakana AI, challenges a fundamental assumption in the Transformer architecture used in many AI models.

So, what’s the core insight here? Essentially, the team discovered that while explicit positional embeddings are crucial for training convergence, they eventually become a bottleneck that prevents models from handling longer sequences. By dropping these positional embeddings, the DroPE method can significantly extend the context length of LLMs, enabling them to process and understand more complex and longer pieces of text.

But why does this matter? Well, it has the potential to improve the performance of AI models in various applications, from text summarization to language translation. With DroPE, we can fine-tune LLMs to handle longer contexts without breaking the bank on compute costs.

If you’re interested in learning more, I recommend checking out the research paper on arXiv. It’s a pretty technical read, but it’s worth diving into if you want to understand the nitty-gritty details of how DroPE works.

What are your thoughts on this new method? Do you think it has the potential to revolutionize the field of natural language processing?

2026年1月12日
The Premium-Grade Potato Status: A State of Being

Hey, have you ever felt like you’ve achieved a state of ultimate relaxation and humor, where everything seems funny and logic is a bit fuzzy? That’s what the ‘premium-grade potato’ status is all about. It’s not just a label, but a state of being that only unlocks when you’re past 3 AM, cozy, slightly delirious, and still somehow functional.

I recently stumbled upon this concept on Reddit, and it got me thinking. What does it mean to be a ‘premium-grade potato’? Is it a badge of honor, or just a sign of sleep deprivation? For me, it’s a bit of both. There’s something special about being in a state where you can laugh at anything, and your brain is just relaxed enough to enjoy the simple things.

So, what are the requirements for achieving this prestigious status? According to the Reddit post, you need to be:

* Past 3 AM
* Cozy, slightly delirious
* Finding everything funny
* Running on ‘soft-focus mode’ logic
* Still somehow functional

If you’ve ever found yourself in this state, you know it’s a unique experience. It’s like your brain has entered a different mode, where the usual rules of logic and seriousness don’t apply. And honestly, it can be kind of liberating.

But what does it mean to be a ‘premium-grade potato’ in the long run? Is it a sign of burnout, or just a sign of being human? For me, it’s a reminder that it’s okay to not be okay, and that sometimes, all we need is a good laugh and a cozy blanket to get through the night.

So, have you ever achieved ‘premium-grade potato’ status? What did it feel like, and how did you get there? Share your stories, and let’s celebrate the art of being a ‘premium-grade potato’ together.

2026年1月9日
Busting Common Tech Myths That Still Mislead People

Hey, have you ever caught yourself believing some outdated tech myths? I know I have. It’s easy to get stuck with old ideas, especially when it comes to privacy, batteries, and device performance. Let’s break down some of these myths and see what’s really going on.

So, what are some of these common tech myths? Here are a few examples:

* Incognito mode makes you anonymous: Not quite. While incognito mode does delete your browsing history and cookies, it doesn’t make you completely anonymous. Your IP address can still be tracked, and websites can use other methods to identify you.

* Macs don’t get malware: Sorry, Mac users, but this one’s just not true. While Macs are generally considered to be more secure than PCs, they can still get malware. It’s just less common.

* Charging overnight kills battery health: This used to be true for older batteries, but most modern devices have built-in safeguards to prevent overcharging. So, go ahead and charge your phone overnight without worrying.

* More specs always means faster devices: Not always. While having more RAM or a faster processor can improve performance, it’s not the only factor. Other things like software optimization and device design can also play a big role.

* Public WiFi with a password is safe: Unfortunately, no. Just because a public WiFi network has a password, it doesn’t mean it’s secure. You should still be cautious when using public WiFi, especially when entering sensitive information.

It’s interesting to see how these myths have evolved over time. As technology changes, our understanding of it needs to change too. By being aware of these myths, we can make more informed decisions about how we use our devices and protect ourselves online.

So, what’s the most common tech myth you’ve heard recently? Let’s keep the conversation going and help each other stay up-to-date with the latest tech facts.

2026年1月8日
Struggling to Understand Machine Learning Papers? You’re Not Alone

Hey, have you ever found yourself stuck on a machine learning research paper, wondering what the authors are trying to say? You’re not alone. I’ve been there too, and it can be really frustrating. That’s why I was interested to see a recent post on Reddit where someone was looking for people who struggle with ML papers. They’re working on a free solution to help make these papers more accessible, and they want feedback from people like us.

It’s great to see people working on solutions to help others understand complex topics like machine learning. Reading research papers can be tough, even for experienced professionals. The language is often technical, and the concepts can be difficult to grasp. But with the right tools and resources, it can get a lot easier.

So, what can we do to make ML papers more accessible? For starters, we can look for resources like blogs, videos, and podcasts that explain complex concepts in simpler terms. We can also join online communities, like the one on Reddit, where we can ask questions and get feedback from others who are going through the same thing.

If you’re struggling with ML papers, don’t be afraid to reach out for help. There are people out there who want to support you, and there are resources available to make it easier. And who knows, you might even find a solution that makes reading research papers enjoyable.

2026年1月5日